2003 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (217 HP) has 138 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2003 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A6 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A6 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 46 L |
