2003 Audi A8 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Audi A8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A8 (276 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 Audi A8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A8 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A8 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3936 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 79 L |
