2003 Audi A8 vs. 2006 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A8 would be higher. At 3,936 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A8 (276 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2006 Smart Roadster. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A8 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 2006 Smart Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A8 (650 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart Roadster. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A8 | 2006 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Smart |
Model | A8 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3936 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 650 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 35 L |