2003 Audi A8 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A8 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A8 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A8 weights approximately 653 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A8 (300 Nm @ 8200 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A8 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A8 | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 8200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |