2003 Audi A8 vs. 2012 Buick Regal
To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A8 would be higher. At 2,974 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick Regal (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Audi A8. (216 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A8 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2012 Buick Regal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick Regal (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A8. (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A8.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A8 | 2012 Buick Regal | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A8 | Regal |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2974 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4831 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |