2003 Audi A8 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A8 would be higher. At 3,936 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2003 Audi A8. (272 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A8 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Because 2003 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac XTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A8 (650 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A8 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A8 | XTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3936 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 650 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |