2003 Audi LeMans vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Audi LeMans is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi LeMans (601 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 404 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi LeMans should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 670 kg more than 2003 Audi LeMans.
Because 2003 Audi LeMans is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi LeMans will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi LeMans | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | LeMans | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4961 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 601 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
