2003 Audi LeMans vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi LeMans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi LeMans would be higher. At 4,961 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Audi LeMans is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi LeMans (601 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. (298 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi LeMans should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2003 Audi LeMans is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi LeMans will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi LeMans (750 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2003 Audi LeMans will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi LeMans | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | LeMans | E |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4961 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 601 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 750 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 3.7 seconds | 6.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |