2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro has automatic transmission and 1966 Jaguar E-Type has manual transmission. 1966 Jaguar E-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 1966 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | E-Type |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1280 mm |
