2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 1260 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | 626 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1520 mm |