2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2006 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 MG ZT-T is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 840 kg more than 2006 MG ZT-T.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 MG ZT-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro has automatic transmission and 2006 MG ZT-T has manual transmission. 2006 MG ZT-T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2006 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | ZT-T |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |