2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 836 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |