2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 950 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | 6 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1795 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1440 mm |
