2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 65 kg more than 2012 BMW X5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2012 BMW X5 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | X5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 555 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 2435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1763 mm |