2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 547 kg more than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Pikes Peak Quattro | XF |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1461 mm |
