2003 Audi RS4 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2003 Audi RS4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS4 (377 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 595 kg more than 2003 Audi RS4.
Because 2003 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS4 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS4 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 377 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |