2003 Audi RS4 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2003 Audi RS4 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS4 (377 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2003 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS4 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | RS4 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 377 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 36 L |
