2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1958 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1958 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | RS6 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |