2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS6 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |
