2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 79 L |
