2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | RS6 | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |