2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. (198 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 365 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS6 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 8191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3220 mm |