2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 395 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | RS6 | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2160 mm |