2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2003 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS6 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4690 mm |
