2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1986 Mercury Sable.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Audi | Mercury |
| Model | RS6 | Sable |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
