2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1990 Jaguar Kensington

To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar Kensington. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar Kensington would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar Kensington is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar Kensington. (295 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar Kensington.

Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Jaguar Kensington. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar Kensington. (433 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar Kensington.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Audi RS6 1990 Jaguar Kensington
Make Audi Jaguar
Model RS6 Kensington
Year Released 2003 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 5344 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 444 HP 295 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 560 Nm 433 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 12.5:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2870 mm