2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2003 Audi RS6. (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi RS6.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi RS6. (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | RS6 | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 349 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 340 mm |
