2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi RS6. (560 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | RS6 | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 968 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 368 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
