2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2003 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | RS6 | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
