2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 279 more horse power than 1996 Subaru Outback. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Subaru Outback. (221 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Audi | Subaru |
Model | RS6 | Outback |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |