2003 Audi RS6 vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. (468 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | RS6 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 468 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.1:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2690 mm |