2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 166 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2000 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | RS6 | Ram |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2076 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |