2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2003 Audi RS6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar X400. (390 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar X400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar X400. (525 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar X400. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2003 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | RS6 | X400 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 525 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 69 L |