2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. (280 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi RS6 weights approximately 158 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. (369 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS6 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 369 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |