2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 394 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS6 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |