2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2005 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2005 GMC Yukon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2005 GMC Yukon. (336 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 703 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Yukon. (509 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2005 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | RS6 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 336 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 117 L |