2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi RS6 | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | RS6 | Nessie |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |