2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 331 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | RS6 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 46 L |
