2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 326 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 2003 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS6 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
