2003 Audi RS6 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2003 Audi RS6. (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi RS6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 84 kg more than 2003 Audi RS6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi RS6. (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi RS6 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS6 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 548 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 747 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1994 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |
