2003 Audi TT vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo 144 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi TT (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi TT weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi TT | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | TT | 144 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |
