2003 Audi TT vs. 1992 Dodge Colt
To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi TT (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Colt. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi TT weights approximately 310 kg more than 1992 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi TT | 1992 Dodge Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | TT | Colt |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 92 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2400 mm |
