2003 Audi TT vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi TT (161 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 190 kg more than 2003 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2003 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi TT | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | TT | CR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |