2003 Audi TT vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi TT (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi TT weights approximately 365 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Audi TT 1998 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Audi Mitsubishi
Model TT Colt
Year Released 2003 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1299 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 161 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 109 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 945 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2430 mm