2003 Audi TT vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Audi TT. (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi TT weights approximately 181 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi TT | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |