2003 Audi TT vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Audi TT. (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi TT | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | Raider |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |
