2003 Audi TT vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi TT (237 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi TT | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | TT | Stavic |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |