2003 Audi TT vs. 2011 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Audi TT. (161 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 613 kg more than 2003 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 SsangYong Rodius is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 SsangYong Rodius. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT. 2011 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2003 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi TT | 2011 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | TT | Rodius |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |