2003 Avanti Sport Convertible vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque weights approximately 19 kg more than 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has automatic transmission and 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible has manual transmission. 2003 Avanti Sport Convertible will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Avanti Sport Convertible | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Make | Avanti | Land Rover |
Model | Sport Convertible | Range Rover Evoque |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1669 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1636 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2662 mm |