2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 1952 Buick 40

To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,751 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: